RIGA — Staff disgruntlement at Diena, one of Latvia’s most popular dailies, boiled over Friday as the two top editors and 12 journalists quit due to a lack of trust in the paper’s new management and ownership.
The situation at the paper had been tenuous for months since an announcement that the paper, along with Dienas Biznes, another daily, had been purchased by an unnamed foreign investor. But after a meeting Friday with managing director Alexandrs Tralmaks, Diena’s top editors finally decided that their vision of the paper’s future did not coincide with that of Tralmaks and the owner — whom Tralmaks finally named as the Rowland family from England.
“I believe that the current owner of Diena is not working as a quality media interest and therefore submitted my resignation,” Nellija Ločmele, chief editor of the Dienas Medijii publisher, said, according to the paper’s website. In addition Diena’s editor-in-chief Anita Brauna and opinion page editor Pauls Raudseps, a U.S. citizen, also resigned. According to the last count, another 11 journalists had quit the paper, the website reported.
The sudden exodus at what is arguably Latvia’s most influential paper, at a time when Latvia is suffering its worst economic crisis since gaining independence in 1991, came like a bolt out of the blue at the end of an arduous week for the Baltic state. For many Diena had represented a beacon of integrity in country known for unscrupulous journalism. Diena also set itself apart by fighting for things like rights of sexual minorities, a subject most dailies in Latvia wouldn’t dare go near.
“The outcome was inevitable,” Aivars Ozoliņš, a leading journalist at the paper, told Baltic Reports. “We had hoped for the best. We tried to maintain high standards of journalism, but from what we saw from the new ownership over the past three months was just bluff.”
Ločmele said the paper, one of Latvia’s two leading dailies by print-run, had been running on two legs — ad revenues and subscription. The financial crisis cut off one leg, and the paper’s new owners “are trying to stop the bleeding by applying pressure at the neck.” She and other journalists were dissatisfied that the name of the paper’s new owners had been kept from them for three months. For the staff of Diena, a paper that for nearly two decades prided itself on transparency and openness, this secrecy was unacceptable. Ozoliņš told Baltic Reports that staff members tried to contact the Rowland family in England before quitting but were unsuccessful.
“The main thing is that our values don’t correspond with those of the new management,” he said. “Also, it seemed to some of the people on the staff that his [Tralmaks’] business propositions are not sound.” In his words, the new cost-cutting plan for the paper included a 40 percent pay cut for staff despite previous reductions.
Tralmaks was quoted as saying that the essential issue was not about who was the editor but about whether Diena and other publications were making a profit or loss, and currently the operation was in the red. Last year the Diena group of publications posted 22.9 million lats (€32.5 million) in sales, down 11 percent year-on-year, and finished the year with a loss of 1.8 million lats (€2.5 million).
The Baltic News Service reported that, according to Tralmaks, the Rowlands are a U.K. family with businesses that include the Blackfish Group, which provides investment management and consultations to private clients. Diena reported that the acting editor would become Dace Andersone, who is currently the editor in chief of Dienas Bizness.
Meanwhile Ločmele said that she planned to rest for a while and decide what she would do later. There is speculation that the staff has already located a potential investor and may create a new publication.
Worth to mention – Tralmaks wanted to cut next year’s budget for 55%. Ločmele proposed plan, that had 33% cut. Also Ločmele was asked to leave newspaper quietly month ago. She refused. Since the Tralmak’s course did not change, this was just a matter of time something like this happened.
btw: citadiena.wordpress.com
I really ha a lot of time today – more on topic.
Well, “Diena” is left with just about 20% chance to live – that’s clear. Only a very good chain of properly executed PR acts [like with aquiring weel known and trusted professionals] can make a base for return.
As always – everyone’s fight for power and their interests. Nellija&Co couldn’t buy out ‘Diena”, so, from her part, every interest to work further in full capacity, well, deminished. Of course, actions of Tralmaks in these months was a massive f—up for newspaper’s integrity. Also he demonstrated unbelievebly stubborn atitude in learing from his mistakes.
Clearly – no one here is white and shiny.
Dunno, as N&Co had resources for buying a newspaper, then they are available now [prbbly, less]. Nice PR! This collective walkout does not seem as some emotional thing for me – not at all. Seems like there’s a backup plan, where most of “goers” will find a place.
Somewhere in teh mighty internets there was an opinion, that in this situation all journalists, even from ither publishers etc. should work together… I will not even discuss this infantile suggestion. If you want to know why – ask.
About “Diena”s staff: An option that they all leave – get real! Life isn’t a movie and, especially in these times, there’s absolutely no guarantees they will find jobs in their specialities right away. Even more – you must be 100% sure in others motives to do such a thing and I highly doubt, that this is a case in “Diena” collective.
About an attitude, that “goers” showed to “stayers” with their walk-out – tough. But you have a job, do it. And ifyou do it good and proffesional – it will be noticed. Sooner or later.
So, don’t cry for me, Argentina!