The Times Online ran an editorial on their comment page on March 4 where they encouraged fellow Brits to welcome the new wave of Latvian economic migrants with open arms. Said The Times, “We should welcome Latvians warmly for all that they have contributed to the world, and for what they might, therefore, contribute to Britain.”
To make its point, The Times listed a number of internationally recognized names associated with Latvia, but as several commentators pointed out, none of them were actually ethnic Latvians. Eisenstein, Berlin, Rothko and Baryshnikov were either born or simply lived here, and no doubt knew Latvians to some degree, but none were Latvians themselves.
But I don’t think that changes the spirit of what The Times was saying in its editorial. People from Latvia have always done well in other countries and tend to add rather than subtract from whatever environment they land in.
The key words here are “people from Latvia,” because the air, water and Baltic Sea vibes that are unique to this place and this place alone, have a lingering affect on anyone who’s stood under a Riga pine in a Kurzeme forest. (Or a grove of birches on a Vidzeme hillside.) Regardless of which ethnic group you started your life in, once you’ve been through several seasonal cycles on a piece of land that the Europeans once called Livonia, the sunsets have a cumulative effect and something mystical rubs off.
The composer Richard Wagner came to Riga to escape his debtors and France’s King Louis XVIII sought refuge in Jelgava from Napoleon. Doubt if either one learned the local language, given their preoccupation with greater concerns. But Mikhail Baryshnikov does speak Latvian fluently and once claimed that when he and fellow Russian dancer Boris Godunov visited Moscow, they would speak in Latvian to each other so that no one else could understand them. Latvian as the secret language of codes? Wouldn’t be the first time.
Code-breaking was no doubt one of the concerns of legendary U.S. diplomat George Kennan when he was stationed in Rīga in the 1930s. It wasn’t until 1946 that Kennan wrote his famous “long telegram” warning the U.S State Department to be wary of the U.S.S.R. Clearly Kennan’s earlier days in Rīga left an impression.
Some social scientists debate whether ethnic identity is something inherent in humans, or an acquired taste. If you’re a “primordialist” you believe that your ethnic identity is etched in your genes, now and forever. But the “instrumentalists” argue that people actively adopt and utilize their ethnic identity in order to foster wealth, power or status.
In Chicago, everyone became Irish on St. Patrick’s Day, and stayed Irish if they wanted a good position in the city government. During the 1980’s and the rise of the Solidarność movement in Poland, the same people who once made fun of Poles dug out their family trees to prove that they too had noble Polish heritage.
Back in 1995, when I was serving as Latvia’s Ambassador to the U.S., I was introduced to Franklin A. Sonn, the first post-apartheid black man to be appointed South Africa’s Ambassador to the United States. When we met, he smiled and said that his grandfather was from Riga. After the surprised look on my face subsided, Ambassador Sonn proceeded to describe his rich ethnic heritage, which included both Riga Jews and African tribal chieftains.
Michael Strautmanis, a friend and close adviser of President Obama, is an African-American with a very Latvian last name and an equally keen understanding of Latvian culture because he was raised by a Latvian stepfather in Chicago.
So the Brits need not worry about people coming from Riga to London in search of fame, fortune or just a job. But they should keep in mind that it could work both ways. One of Riga’s most celebrated and accomplished mayors at the turn of the last century was a Brit by the name of George Armistead. There’s even a statue of him and his wife and dog by the canal near the Latvian National Opera.
If one of the future mayors of London happens to be from Latvia, you don’t have to include the dog.
Ojārs Kalniņš is the director of the Latvian Institute. The Latvian Institute (Latvijas institūts) was established by the Latvian state to provide a wide range of information about Latvia, its society, culture and history. For more information visit www.li.lv.
Disclaimer:
Views expressed in the opinion section are never those of the Baltic Reports company or the website’s editorial team as a whole, but merely those of the individual writer.
What is the link of U.S golfer Natalie Gulbis?
The current Mayor of London has roots in Istanbul, so maybe. Latvia will eventually get its turn. One of Thatcher’s finance ministers was Nigel Lawson, whoe has roots in Lativa. His daughter is the famous TV chef Nigella Lawson. A former foreign minister Malcolm Rifkind also had roots in Latvia.
The major gap in understanding between ¨the West¨ and Latvia is that Jews are not seen as a separate nationalisty or ethnic group in the West, and certainly not in hte UK whereas thay are in Latvia.
Further letters to the Times generated by the article highlihgted how jarring the phrase ¨he’s not Latvian, he’s Jewish¨ is to western ears. It smacks of Nazism and the Holocaust. For Latvians, indeed for Latvian Jews, it is simply a statement of fact.
What is interesting is that there seems to be a distinction being made between “nationality” and “ethnicity”. The people that I know (including myself) who are Jewish with roots in Latvia – refer to themselves as Latvian Jews (although my great-grandfather on the census was listed as coming from Russia, as when he left the Baltics in the early 1900s, Latvia was still a part of Russia, among others). I also hear people in Latvia remark with pride that Marc Rothko and Isiah Berlin were from Latvia (was there not recently a celebration of Berlin’s birth in Riga?). So, yes, they may not be “ethnically” Latvian, but they are “Latvian”. The bigger question is, though, what exactly makes a Latvian a “Latvian”? Especially since ethnic Latvians are themselves a combination of several different ethnic groups (Liv, Kursi, etc..).
Also, Ojars….most Social Scientists are abandoning the use of phrases such as primordial and instrumental when discussing ethnicity. As studies have shown that defining ethnicity much more complicated and may not be able to be theorized.